Hello, I am glad to see your thoughtful response. Feel free to ask anything.

You’re saying here that the mind against porn is a legal mind that exercises requirements in the person to not look at porn but then this legal mind is not really against porn because that same legal mind also gives in to see porn because teh flesh is too weak and cannot overcome law. It’s the same legal mind that is for and against porn. And this legal mind engages in a futile mental civil war between looking at porn versus feels shame and sets-up laws to stop looking at porn.

The legal mind, whilst only appearing to be against the behavior known as porn, is in fact for it. How so? By creating an opportunity for the body to become aroused and to cause the very behavior the regulation 'prohibited'. It doesn't really prohibit it then, it promotes it. It not only is unable to abolish the supposedly bad outward behavior, but it causes the knowledge of condemnation inwardly. Meaning that through giving heed to regulations it is impossible to attain to the knowledge of righteousness, of not having sinned; it is impossible to think reasonably, because there are conflicting thoughts of insanity; it is impossible to keep the very regulation you heed either. Not only because the law itself implies the ability to transgress (for why would I impose a law upon you if you can't transgress? It's foolish.), but because in response to it the bodily motions that the legal mind arouses eventually lead to the knowledge of having transgressed a boundary through a particular behavior.

For the law is not concerned with outward appearance, but is spiritual, concerned with the heart. - Georgi

I am confused with this sentence. Please help. I think you are saying that an eternal law or true law is birthed in the heart and this law is a Life of its own and not concerned with outward appearances, however when we are tempted and give in to look at porn this eternal law is not touched.

Haven't you noticed in your day-to-day life that without exception all the laws of mankind are concerned entirely with outward appearance? Not so the law of God. For God examines the inward being and he relates to it on that basis. The eternal law is the very being of God. Those who fall short of his own life are still dead and therefore un-right in view of what life is all about.  The life that exempts us from the expectation of having to die cannot be attainted to by the regulations that are concerned only with the outward dead flesh and that imply that we can still die through transgression.

It seems you are saying that someone who is one with Christ could look at porn or not look at porn and either way that would be okay because the one in Christ does not get aroused while viewing porn nor is he tempted to look at porn after not viewing porn for weeks. He sees through porn (the outward appearance) to what porn is truly about and he only sees porn in the light and Life of Christ. Hope that makes sense?!?!?

Who is the one that continues to live in sin? Answer: ?? - Georgi

Still very much tempted and weak, so far as the flesh is concerned. But the life of God cannot be tempted, nor does he tempt. Because He is the freedom from the flesh that is tempted. But seeing that we ourselves cannot sin, we also cannot transgress. So that though our flesh is weak, we can live in peace with it, not attempting to free ourselves from it seeing that we already are far from being it. Therefore we don't live in view of regulations.

We can do things that others cannot and in view of a purpose and a hope they neither know nor have access to. They cannot shift they behavior as they please without becoming condemned in their minds for transgressing a certain code of conduct they perceive themselves to be bound to. All that they ever do whilst living in view of the condemnation caused by the regulation is to seek to appear right in comparison with others.

 In the world, men bound by the perceptions of their outward regulations are also bound to perceive one sided issues as if they are both good and bad. That's why one fleshly behavior is condemned and another is praised. But it still is in fact the same dead flesh. Obviously this allows for them to condemn others to death whilst supposedly exempting themselves from it. But if they judge the appearance of others as condemned to death, and yet they bear the same appearance, what are they saying of themselves? But the flesh, ruling over their minds through the law, blinds them to their own unrighteousness while they are quick to condemn others. The righteous judgment that apprehends all things without this ugly bias is impossible within the legal mind.

So then, the one who continues to reinforce an obligation to a life in view of the knowledge of sin is the one who creates an opportunity for the dead flesh through the law. 

We ourselves are then being revealed to be evil, for we are plainly seen to be in consent to the mind of evil, whereas that righteous man whom we did not recognize as righteous by his appearance was all the while in variance with the very evil we lured him into. It would have been better for us not to have been born at all, for now not only are we become the true transgressors of the living law, but are also causing the righteous men of God to stumble. - Georgi

Those who are so quick to lure others into their legal frameworks wherein they have set themselves up as examples of righteousness are the ones that are in agreement with the mind of evil. They are dead, extortionists, manipulators, hypocrites, liars, murderers, fornicators, haters, abusers, boastful, malignant, they feed their stupid pursuits for rightness through the life and labor of others, seeking to find glory in mere flesh. It is certainly far more profitable for such not to have been born at all, than to spend their years in view of the knowledge of sin and to become a source of stumbling for the truly upright at heart, that is those in whom God has made his dwelling.